Fujifilm 23mm f2 lens - $350-$400. Smallrig cage - $50-$60, not really sure. NATO left handle- around $60 as well. Battery grip - around $40 or so. Smallrig right side handle with record button - around $80. There are a couple of other things, but nothing worth more than $50 or so.
Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-T200 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A6300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera. Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a short overview of how the Fujifilm X-T200 grades versus the A6300 when it comes to portability, imaging
Updated on: July 20th, 2018. There are many differences between the Sony a6300 and the Fujifilm X-Pro2 but two of the most important characteristics - image quality and autofocus - actually behave in a similar manner. Both cameras inaugurated the two most recent APS-C sensors that have since been implemented on other products such as the X-T20, X-T2 and a6500 respectively, and their
The Sony a6300 takes the lead with a score of 61/100, while the Canon EOS M50 Mark II trails close behind at 59/100. Both cameras are mirrorless, announced in 2016 and 2020, and have similar launch prices of $1000 and $750, respectively. The Canon EOS M50 Mark II is slightly smaller and lighter, measuring 116 x 88 x 59mm and weighing 387g, compared to the Sony a6300's dimensions of 120 x 67
At 404g with the SD card and battery, the a6300 is only a little heavier than the a6000, which weighs in at 344g. It is also slightly thicker at 120 x 66.9 x 48.8 mm versus 120 x 66.9 x 45.1 mm. While the a6000 lacks weather-sealing, the a6300 features a magnesium alloy body with dust and splash resistance.
